In its design for the Lascaux Caves Museum in France, Snøhetta
obviously carved into the landscape to form the building itself. However, it is
the above-ground treatment, the surface and landscaping, which serves as the
precedent study for my parti. Because the majority of the museum is located
underground, pathways and green space are allowed to invade the top of the
building. This idea blurs the concept of interior and exterior spaces as well
as converts the usually unusable roof space into functional and inviting
spaces.
It is this concept of blurring the above-ground and
below-ground spaces which serves as the basis for my parti. The underground
passageway extends throughout the entire site and creates the primary form in
the landscape. By essentially “unfolding” different sides of the box, I am able
to create entry points to the top of the passageway, entry points to the underground
portion, and create points of interest on either side of the passageway as
well. Thus, while the main passageway serves as the processional center of the
design, activity can happen in, on, and around it at all times. The pool area(s),
farmers market area, café, and park areas are seamlessly intertwined as a
result. Like the Lascaux Caves Museum, pathways, landscaping and seating spots
turn the generally unusable space above the carved-in earth into central points
of interest on the site. Pathways lead also to the second-story café, which
includes a patio space. Park-goers will love the views they will gain of the
river and Pioneer Flour Mill on top of the structure, and the green space can
be used for markets, receptions, games, and more. On the other side of Probandt
Street, the pathway emerges from underground continuing the same concept of
blurring above and below-ground spaces. The pathway unfolds here as well, where
the artist studio is located. Local artists utilizing the space will be greeted
with a brilliant, close-up second-story view of both the Blue Star Arts Complex
and the San Antonio River.
Obviously there are a couple of major differences between Snøhetta’s
Lascaux Caves Museum and my adaptation of their idea for my parti. For
starters, the scale is radically different. Snøhetta’s museum (and site) is
enormous, while our project is situated in Southtown, San Antonio. However, the
Caves Museum is located at a junction of two neighborhoods on a river in
France, much like our site. In addition, the Snøhetta project is first and foremost
a programmatic building, whereas in my parti, the underground passageway is the
main organizational element, and the few buildings we have will be offshoots of
that walkway. Finally, another major difference between the projects is the
form itself. The Lascaux Caves Museum is made up of very organic forms, very
fitting for the concept of a building which is also a “cave.” That being said,
the form is not what is being drawn from this precedent. Rather, it is the
concept of blurring the above and below-ground space in the project which I intend
to use as the main driver of my design this semester.
-chip
![]() |
Through walkways and landscaping on the exterior of the building, the "roof" space of the Lascaux Caves Museum by Snohetta becomes as functional as the inside of the building itself. |
![]() |
Much like our site, Snohetta's project involved the junction
of multiple neighborhoods and includes a river.
|